Pages

Friday, June 30, 2006

Why SpaceCommand?

It just occurs for anyone reading why SpaceCommand? It becomes clear when issues in your repertoire were in a timely manner as you had presented in advance pertinent to the Strategic Defense Initiative. In many ways that idea has moved ahead with our current Space Command, and is so relevant. You may perceive this principle as personal chemistry, kindred spirits operating through linguistics. For some years you may have read about "sources and methods," as applied research in National Security studies has formed a unique historical perspective. Those having experience in commentaries and other efforts directed toward government may understand this more fully. In my thoughts politics, American Studies, Political Science and Presidential Studies affirm the gist of themes from an autobiographical perspective. Personal interests and scholarship taken together involved The Study of the Future, Music, and the game of chess. That initial focus dovetailed into communications research and a systemic feedback loop of citizen duty. Once you attain something through the writing, the logical follow through is to do so again. But remember this is more than only one personal vision.

For a background in how my project came to pass and how it continues, picture a long walk through a University Bookstore. You are wishing to proceed further with your education after some years since graduation. You find the latest books in your major field, one of which is published by the USGPO. Later you open it into a random page, making your commentary.

So consider how in many ways important things in life happen and are not just from a one minute manager, but a matter of seconds when you make a decision and proceed upon it. On another score, say you call a friend long distance after winning a chess championship, and one year later you end up in London playing Gary Kasparov in the Savoy Theater at blitz chess. You can trace what happened as it began with say 10 seconds of conversation. Translate that of course into your own field of interests.

These events of the chess world happened from specific actions and worlds, but recognizing it now is pertinent as eventualities have happened several times previously from experience. I am certain the principle extends through self to others. Having made this blog autobiographical rather than some current events news item of interest, let me offer thanks for people who visiting here who add their thoughts. Ask questions, after all that is the most basic Socratic method.

There is no doubt in my mind about privately shared writings have already been shouted to the mountain tops by others. In the movies or theater ever so often you see the man at the summit speaking through a bull horn, and then musing with the echo. The aim here is to evaluate and in some sense control the cacophony of words. That you can find yourself being a "favorite son," in politics while continuing in everyday life without public acknowledgments may open more creativity. On another front the reference to the "Nobel Prize syndrome," enters for scientists who so often do less science after the award at the same level.

For me the adventure is somewhat more than any further acknowledgments. While it is comforting to experience awards others achieve through at least some of the efforts, remember it is very often a 10 second world that makes all the difference, as you may get the drift here. FDR more than once quipped to some influential scientist or businessman, "it's all very theoretical," as he moved on to his next task or appointment on his agenda.

Ronald Reagan and the White House once sent a favorite photograph, with equestrian stride. In my thoughts a certain personal approach realized facilitated concepts amidst businesslike developments. It is all about a creative and healthful parlance with active visionary ideals day by day. While facing the future it is always good to proceed with traditional values. That includes the horse, its great stories throughout history, and a bright understanding of the human spirit.

2 comments:

SamuelAlito said...

1) I was well aware of the Jackson quote and changed Marshall to Stevens as a comment on the relative powers of the executives and the courts when push comes to shove. Scan the crowds of Florida State Seminoles and Atlanta Braves games to determine who came out on top in that one.

2) I already have an agent, thanks.

SpaceCommand said...

Thanks for your comment Justice Alito.

As you might know from reading this blog, the gist of it is basically biography on a personal level. The meaning about government is that it thrives on listening to the people.

In a curious way people can discover that what they say is valued, and sometimes it is valued far more greatly than they previously imagined.

So being an average citizen, if there exists such a concept, the factor is being a wordsmith while others are the power brokers, if you will. Sometimes the boundaries are de facto interdependent, as an honest world would view the cumulative proceedings.

Having a political office is a great opportunity to proceed upon the political theory outlined here through the biographical sphere.

It is one United States Government. People do not necessarily understand that fully. It means that the courts and the executive and the judiciary have a more than only cooperative relationship. It is all about a more perfect Union. But it is also about State and personal sovereignty.

You knew all of this, but "everything has been said and only remains to be said again." So people take the opportunity for helpful reminders to know what we know well.

Thank you again for your participation, and thank you for your recent comments at the Ronald Reagan library. May people more fully know how much this means to all of us.